An Econometric Analysis of the Determinants of Government Health Expenditures in Nigeria
|Author(s)||by M. M. Fasoranti|
|Keywords||Health expenditures, Causality, Determinants.|
|Open Access||Access PDF Open in New Tab|
A healthy population is an indispensable factor in the growth and sustainable development of a nation. Therefore, to achieve sustainable development, every national government cannot but devote sizeable funds to finance health services. To provide a platform for evaluating and controlling government expenditures, it is necessary to know those factors that affect government spending on health. This study therefore examined the determinants of government health expenditures in Nigeria between 1970 and 2012. Focus was on the analysis of government expenditures within the period of study, the determinants of and the direction of causality between government health expenditures and the specified independent variables. Data was sourced from various issues of Central Bank of Nigeria’s publications, National Bureau of Statistics and world bank publications. Data collected was analyzed with the aid of descriptive statistics and the Ordinary Least Square multiple regression. Other tests employed were the Augumented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) unit root test, Johansen co-integration test and the pairwise Granger Causality test. The study found that all variables were stationary at level and that long run relationship existed between government health expenditures and the determinants. Furthermore, all the variables were positively related to government health expenditures except total population of age 14 years and younger. The study found that literacy rate, share of health expenditures in total government expenditures and consumer price index were significant factors in government health expenditures within the study period. On the other hand, per capita GDP, total population of age 65 and above, total population of age 14 and younger and life expectancy rate were found to be insignificant. The causality test showed the existence of uni-directional and bi-directional causality for some variables while for some others, there was no causality. The income elasticity was found to be inelastic showing that health is a necessity. This study recommended higher budgetary allocation to health services and that higher premium be placed on the health needs of the population aged 14 years and younger. Moreover, such funds must be properly managed so as to reach the target population.
ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGE
Online Publication & Two Hard Copies
|International Journal of Empirical Finance||$ 100||$ 170|
|International Journal of Financial Economics||$ 80||$ 150|
|International Journal of Management Sciences||$ 100||$ 170|
|Journal of Empirical Economics||$ 80||$ 150|
|Journal of Education and Literature||$ 60||$ 130|
|Quarterly Journal of Business Studies||$ 50||$ 120|
|Journal of Language and Communication||$ 30||$ 100|
|Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities||$ 80||$ 150|
|Journal of Social Economics||$ 30||$ 100|
|International Journal of Financial Markets||$ 30||$ 100|
|Journal of Public Policy & Governance||$ 30||$ 100|
For a peer-reviewed journal, the publication of articles plays an essential role in the development of a coherent network of knowledge. It is, therefore, essential that all publishers, editors, authors, and reviewers, in the process of publishing the journals, conduct themselves in accordance with the highest level of professional ethics and standards. The publisher is dedicated to supporting the vast efforts of the editors, the academic contributions of authors, and the respected volunteer work undertaken by reviewers. The publisher is also responsible for ensuring that the publication system works smoothly, and that ethical guidelines are applied to assist the editor, author, and reviewer in performing their ethical duties.
The editor has the following responsibilities:
1.The editor should acknowledge receipt of submitted manuscripts within two working days of receipt and ensure an efficient, fair, and timely review process.
2.The editor should ensure that submitted manuscripts are processed in a confidential manner, and that no content of the manuscripts will be disclosed to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
3.The editor should recuse himself or herself from processing manuscripts if he or she has any conflict of interest with any of the authors or institutions related to the manuscripts.
4.The editor should not disclose the names and other details of the reviewers to a third party without the permission of the reviewers.
5.The editor has the right to make the final decision on whether to accept or reject a manuscript with reference to the significance, originality, and clarity of the manuscript and its relevance to the journal.
6.The editor should by no means make any effort to oblige the authors to cite his or her journal either as an implied or explicit condition of accepting their manuscripts for publication.
7.The editor should not use for his or her own research any part of any data or work reported in submitted and as yet unpublished articles.
8.The editor should respond promptly and take reasonable measures when an ethical complaint occurs concerning a submitted manuscript or a published paper, and the editor should immediately contact and consult with the author. In this case, a written formal retraction or correction may also be required.