School Improvement in Ghana: Strategies Adopted by Heads of Junior High Schools in the Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolis, Ghana
|Author(s)||by Michael Amakyi|
|Keywords||change, change strategies, educational change, school improvement, school leadership for change|
|Open Access||Access PDF Open in New Tab|
The purpose of the study was to examine the strategies adopted by school heads in public junior high schools in the Sekondi-Takoradi metropolis, Ghana. Specifically, the study was to identify the predominant change approach adopted and the area of focus for school improvement. A non-experimental descriptive study was conducted using questionnaire to collect data. Data collected were analyzed using frequency counts, group means, and ANOVA. The study revealed that even though the rational approach was the predominant approach adopted for school improvement, its adoption is not significantly different from the adoption of power-coercive approach. However, the study revealed that there was a significant difference between rational approach and reconstructive approach for school improvement and also a significant difference between power-coercive approach and reconstructive approach for school improvement. The study also revealed that school improvement efforts were mainly directed at the ecology of the school. The study was limited by the self-assessment technique employed to evaluate strategies adopted by school heads. In general, respondents in self-assessment tend to self-promote and may be unwilling to disparage their professional activities, believing that doing so may be personally detrimental. The study found the strategies adopted by the respondents to be largely ineffective in having protracted changes in the school. Protracted changes should be anchored in the school’s culture utilizing reconstructive approach. Recommendations included the promotion of the concept of directed autonomy to enable the respondents create a change vision of their schools while being held accountable for their actions.
ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGE
Online Publication & Two Hard Copies
|International Journal of Empirical Finance||$ 100||$ 170|
|International Journal of Financial Economics||$ 80||$ 150|
|International Journal of Management Sciences||$ 100||$ 170|
|Journal of Empirical Economics||$ 80||$ 150|
|Journal of Education and Literature||$ 60||$ 130|
|Quarterly Journal of Business Studies||$ 50||$ 120|
|Journal of Language and Communication||$ 30||$ 100|
|Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities||$ 80||$ 150|
|Journal of Social Economics||$ 30||$ 100|
|International Journal of Financial Markets||$ 30||$ 100|
|Journal of Public Policy & Governance||$ 30||$ 100|
For a peer-reviewed journal, the publication of articles plays an essential role in the development of a coherent network of knowledge. It is, therefore, essential that all publishers, editors, authors, and reviewers, in the process of publishing the journals, conduct themselves in accordance with the highest level of professional ethics and standards. The publisher is dedicated to supporting the vast efforts of the editors, the academic contributions of authors, and the respected volunteer work undertaken by reviewers. The publisher is also responsible for ensuring that the publication system works smoothly, and that ethical guidelines are applied to assist the editor, author, and reviewer in performing their ethical duties.
The editor has the following responsibilities:
1.The editor should acknowledge receipt of submitted manuscripts within two working days of receipt and ensure an efficient, fair, and timely review process.
2.The editor should ensure that submitted manuscripts are processed in a confidential manner, and that no content of the manuscripts will be disclosed to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
3.The editor should recuse himself or herself from processing manuscripts if he or she has any conflict of interest with any of the authors or institutions related to the manuscripts.
4.The editor should not disclose the names and other details of the reviewers to a third party without the permission of the reviewers.
5.The editor has the right to make the final decision on whether to accept or reject a manuscript with reference to the significance, originality, and clarity of the manuscript and its relevance to the journal.
6.The editor should by no means make any effort to oblige the authors to cite his or her journal either as an implied or explicit condition of accepting their manuscripts for publication.
7.The editor should not use for his or her own research any part of any data or work reported in submitted and as yet unpublished articles.
8.The editor should respond promptly and take reasonable measures when an ethical complaint occurs concerning a submitted manuscript or a published paper, and the editor should immediately contact and consult with the author. In this case, a written formal retraction or correction may also be required.