Qualitative Critique: A Heuristic Tool for Doctoral Students to Use in Improving their Research Skills

Qualitative Critique: A Heuristic Tool for Doctoral Students to Use in Improving their Research Skills

Author(s) by Beverly J. Irby, Frederick C. Lunenburg, Rafael Lara-Alecio, Fuhui Tong
Pages 147-158
Keywords
Open Access Access PDF Open in New Tab



Download

Abstract


Early in a doctoral program, it is important for students to understand heuristically how to critique published research. There are several reasons that undergird this important task. First, students of research must be able to integrate findings into practice; second, they must be able to determine the impact of the research on the field, and third, students must be able to decide how the research is related and impacts their own studies. Fourth, the ability to critique published research, and internalizing such a process, provides the students with tools to improve their own research. Fifth, as students develop their review/critique of literature for the dissertation, it is important that they incorporate a critical assessment of the published research. They must know whether the research is viable to support their own work or to refute their findings.Based on these needs, Irbydeveloped a tool for doctoral students that would assist them in evaluating qualitative research studies, named, the Irby Qualitative Research Critique (IQRC). In teaching sudents the use of the took, they are provided with a qualitative research article. Theyare asked to use the IQRC for reviewing the article.In this paper, we share the IQRC and examples of what a beginning doctoral students work in critiquing qualitative studies might entail.The IQCR (Lunenburg& Irby, 2007) includes 14 components.

ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGE

Journal Name

Online Publication

Online Publication & Two Hard Copies

International Journal of Empirical Finance $ 100 $ 170
International Journal of Financial Economics $ 80 $ 150
International Journal of Management Sciences $ 100 $ 170
Journal of Empirical Economics $ 80 $ 150
Journal of Education and Literature $ 60 $ 130
Quarterly Journal of Business Studies $ 50 $ 120
Journal of Language and Communication $ 30 $ 100
Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities $ 80 $ 150
Journal of Social Economics $ 30 $ 100
International Journal of Financial Markets $ 30 $ 100
Journal of Public Policy & Governance $ 30 $ 100

PUBLICATION ETHICS

For a peer-reviewed journal, the publication of articles plays an essential role in the development of a coherent network of knowledge. It is, therefore, essential that all publishers, editors, authors, and reviewers, in the process of publishing the journals, conduct themselves in accordance with the highest level of professional ethics and standards. The publisher is dedicated to supporting the vast efforts of the editors, the academic contributions of authors, and the respected volunteer work undertaken by reviewers. The publisher is also responsible for ensuring that the publication system works smoothly, and that ethical guidelines are applied to assist the editor, author, and reviewer in performing their ethical duties.

The editor has the following responsibilities:

1.The editor should acknowledge receipt of submitted manuscripts within two working days of receipt and ensure an efficient, fair, and timely review process.
2.The editor should ensure that submitted manuscripts are processed in a confidential manner, and that no content of the manuscripts will be disclosed to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
3.The editor should recuse himself or herself from processing manuscripts if he or she has any conflict of interest with any of the authors or institutions related to the manuscripts.
4.The editor should not disclose the names and other details of the reviewers to a third party without the permission of the reviewers.
5.The editor has the right to make the final decision on whether to accept or reject a manuscript with reference to the significance, originality, and clarity of the manuscript and its relevance to the journal.
6.The editor should by no means make any effort to oblige the authors to cite his or her journal either as an implied or explicit condition of accepting their manuscripts for publication.
7.The editor should not use for his or her own research any part of any data or work reported in submitted and as yet unpublished articles.
8.The editor should respond promptly and take reasonable measures when an ethical complaint occurs concerning a submitted manuscript or a published paper, and the editor should immediately contact and consult with the author. In this case, a written formal retraction or correction may also be required.

Style Selector
Oregional Skin
bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates
Bootswatch Skins (11)
bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates

These are just examples and you can build your own color scheme in the backend.

Background Patterns
bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates bootstrap business templates