An Investigation of the Impact of Media Content on Voter Perception and Their Choice of Presidential Candidates: A Case Study of Sayare Radio in Kisii Town
|Author(s)||by Jonai Wabwire|
|Keywords||Media; Media content; Voter perception; Libralization of Media|
|Open Access||Access PDF Open in New Tab|
An investigation of the impact of media content on voter perceptions and their choice of presidential candidate was carried out in kisii town, Kenya. The study focused on Sayare Radio station whose broadcasts cover the Gusii region. The outcomes of the study show that the media especially Radio is still the dominant source of information on presidential candidates during elections. A total of 79 percent of the respondents indicated they had obtained information on presidential candidates from the media. Media has a significant effect on the opinions of voters. A total of 24 percent of those who listened to broadcasts changed their minds after listening to political programs.Another significant finding was that some respondents who received broadcasts did not know whether their voting choice was influenced by the media or not.Sayare Radio commands a listenership percentage of 35 percent within the Kisii Town region as far as the coverage of political events is concerned. Of the respondents who listened to Sayare Radio’s broadcasts, 50 percent agreed with the position that its coverage of political events leading up to the elections was objective and balanced. Another 39 percent of the respondents who listened to Sayare Radio’s broadcasts disagreed with the position that its coverage of political events leading up to the elections was objective and balanced.A total of 11 percent of the respondents who listened to Sayare Radio’s broadcasts were non – committal on whether or not they were influenced to vote for their candidates of choice by the broadcasts. It is therefore evident that the media has a significant effect on the voter’s opinion when it comes to presidential elections. The media plays a major role in determining the outcome of presidential elections in terms of providing voters with information about presidential candidates and also influencing their opinions on the most suitable candidates to vote for.
ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGE
Online Publication & Two Hard Copies
|International Journal of Empirical Finance||$ 100||$ 170|
|International Journal of Financial Economics||$ 80||$ 150|
|International Journal of Management Sciences||$ 100||$ 170|
|Journal of Empirical Economics||$ 80||$ 150|
|Journal of Education and Literature||$ 60||$ 130|
|Quarterly Journal of Business Studies||$ 50||$ 120|
|Journal of Language and Communication||$ 30||$ 100|
|Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities||$ 80||$ 150|
|Journal of Social Economics||$ 30||$ 100|
|International Journal of Financial Markets||$ 30||$ 100|
|Journal of Public Policy & Governance||$ 30||$ 100|
For a peer-reviewed journal, the publication of articles plays an essential role in the development of a coherent network of knowledge. It is, therefore, essential that all publishers, editors, authors, and reviewers, in the process of publishing the journals, conduct themselves in accordance with the highest level of professional ethics and standards. The publisher is dedicated to supporting the vast efforts of the editors, the academic contributions of authors, and the respected volunteer work undertaken by reviewers. The publisher is also responsible for ensuring that the publication system works smoothly, and that ethical guidelines are applied to assist the editor, author, and reviewer in performing their ethical duties.
The editor has the following responsibilities:
1.The editor should acknowledge receipt of submitted manuscripts within two working days of receipt and ensure an efficient, fair, and timely review process.
2.The editor should ensure that submitted manuscripts are processed in a confidential manner, and that no content of the manuscripts will be disclosed to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
3.The editor should recuse himself or herself from processing manuscripts if he or she has any conflict of interest with any of the authors or institutions related to the manuscripts.
4.The editor should not disclose the names and other details of the reviewers to a third party without the permission of the reviewers.
5.The editor has the right to make the final decision on whether to accept or reject a manuscript with reference to the significance, originality, and clarity of the manuscript and its relevance to the journal.
6.The editor should by no means make any effort to oblige the authors to cite his or her journal either as an implied or explicit condition of accepting their manuscripts for publication.
7.The editor should not use for his or her own research any part of any data or work reported in submitted and as yet unpublished articles.
8.The editor should respond promptly and take reasonable measures when an ethical complaint occurs concerning a submitted manuscript or a published paper, and the editor should immediately contact and consult with the author. In this case, a written formal retraction or correction may also be required.