Methodological and Structural Problems for Sovereign National Conference in Nigeria
|Author(s)||by Ayodeji Bayo Ogunrotifa|
|Keywords||Sovereign national conference, methodology, state structure, Nigeria.|
|Open Access||Access PDF Open in New Tab|
For more than two decades, the Nigerian political space has been preoccupied with the clamour for sovereign national conference (SNC), yet previous attempts (either officially or unofficially) at organising the conference has been fraught with legitimacy crisis, problem of reliability, and validity of its findings/recommendations, that always ends in controversial circumstances. These however represent methodological and structural shortcomings that often frustrate the ambitions of the proponents of SNC. This paper fleshes out the methodological and structural problems bedeviling the convocation of SNC by looking through the problematic nature of Nigerian state, various arguments for and against SNC, and history of previous national conferences. It is argued that holding SNC under ideal and normal circumstances is not realistic, given the plethora of conflicting interests among actors, interest groups and political gladiators, ethnic nationalities and the political/ruling class couple along with legal problems, structural bottlenecks and the methodological problem in the choice of delegates, ownership of the conference, national questions, and the definitional and conceptual articulation of issues to be debated. The paper concludes that Nigerians should look beyond the narrow lens and rhetoric behind SNC, as such clamour will further negate the fragility and stability of the country, and instead, Nigerians should agitate and fight for system change that will usher radical alterations in the existing socio-economic and political structure of the state, and rescue the country from the whims and caprices of backward ruling class, greedy and selfish politicians, and those interest groups who either resort to the politics of ethnicity and religion to divide Nigerians whenever their interest in intra-class conflicts is at stake or who employ the rhetoric of SNC to divert the attention of Nigerians from the everyday problems caused by the misrule and mismanagement of national resources and economy by the Nigerian political leadership.
ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGE
Online Publication & Two Hard Copies
|International Journal of Empirical Finance||$ 100||$ 170|
|International Journal of Financial Economics||$ 80||$ 150|
|International Journal of Management Sciences||$ 100||$ 170|
|Journal of Empirical Economics||$ 80||$ 150|
|Journal of Education and Literature||$ 60||$ 130|
|Quarterly Journal of Business Studies||$ 50||$ 120|
|Journal of Language and Communication||$ 30||$ 100|
|Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities||$ 80||$ 150|
|Journal of Social Economics||$ 30||$ 100|
|International Journal of Financial Markets||$ 30||$ 100|
|Journal of Public Policy & Governance||$ 30||$ 100|
For a peer-reviewed journal, the publication of articles plays an essential role in the development of a coherent network of knowledge. It is, therefore, essential that all publishers, editors, authors, and reviewers, in the process of publishing the journals, conduct themselves in accordance with the highest level of professional ethics and standards. The publisher is dedicated to supporting the vast efforts of the editors, the academic contributions of authors, and the respected volunteer work undertaken by reviewers. The publisher is also responsible for ensuring that the publication system works smoothly, and that ethical guidelines are applied to assist the editor, author, and reviewer in performing their ethical duties.
The editor has the following responsibilities:
1.The editor should acknowledge receipt of submitted manuscripts within two working days of receipt and ensure an efficient, fair, and timely review process.
2.The editor should ensure that submitted manuscripts are processed in a confidential manner, and that no content of the manuscripts will be disclosed to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
3.The editor should recuse himself or herself from processing manuscripts if he or she has any conflict of interest with any of the authors or institutions related to the manuscripts.
4.The editor should not disclose the names and other details of the reviewers to a third party without the permission of the reviewers.
5.The editor has the right to make the final decision on whether to accept or reject a manuscript with reference to the significance, originality, and clarity of the manuscript and its relevance to the journal.
6.The editor should by no means make any effort to oblige the authors to cite his or her journal either as an implied or explicit condition of accepting their manuscripts for publication.
7.The editor should not use for his or her own research any part of any data or work reported in submitted and as yet unpublished articles.
8.The editor should respond promptly and take reasonable measures when an ethical complaint occurs concerning a submitted manuscript or a published paper, and the editor should immediately contact and consult with the author. In this case, a written formal retraction or correction may also be required.