Zimbabwe Economic Crisis: The Social Dimension of the crisis
|Author(s)||by Doreen Nkala, Eukeria Mashiri, Miriam Mugwati|
|Keywords||hyperinflation, social crisis, multicurrency, MDGs|
|Open Access||Access PDF Open in New Tab|
Zimbabwe broke the world record with the highest annual inflation rate of 231,000,000% (BBC news, 2008). As a result, it faced severe economic crisis, which sent many Zimbabweans to Diaspora in search for greener pastures. Empty shelves and poor service delivery became the order of the day as all sectors of the economy were affected. Zimbabwe, the once bread-basket for Africa, became the „empty basket‟. Standards of people deteriorated by the day as industries shut-down and employees laid off. However the de facto multicurrency system brought about change to the economic status. This paper looked at the social dimension of the economic crisis of Zimbabwe during the inflationary period and the period after the introduction of multicurrency, inflation being the proxy for economic crisis. A descriptive survey was conducted with 194 adults (economically minded) to document the experiences of Zimbabweans during the hyperinflationary period and after, as lessons from Zimbabwe. The results were statistically analysed and interpreted. The findings of the study suggested that Zimbabwe can still achieve the Millennium Developmental Goals. The research encourages committed citizen attitude and behaviour and recommends that industry resilience is necessary during a crisis and that government support is continuously needed through corrective policy measures.
ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGE
Online Publication & Two Hard Copies
|International Journal of Empirical Finance||$ 100||$ 170|
|International Journal of Financial Economics||$ 80||$ 150|
|International Journal of Management Sciences||$ 100||$ 170|
|Journal of Empirical Economics||$ 80||$ 150|
|Journal of Education and Literature||$ 60||$ 130|
|Quarterly Journal of Business Studies||$ 50||$ 120|
|Journal of Language and Communication||$ 30||$ 100|
|Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities||$ 80||$ 150|
|Journal of Social Economics||$ 30||$ 100|
|International Journal of Financial Markets||$ 30||$ 100|
|Journal of Public Policy & Governance||$ 30||$ 100|
For a peer-reviewed journal, the publication of articles plays an essential role in the development of a coherent network of knowledge. It is, therefore, essential that all publishers, editors, authors, and reviewers, in the process of publishing the journals, conduct themselves in accordance with the highest level of professional ethics and standards. The publisher is dedicated to supporting the vast efforts of the editors, the academic contributions of authors, and the respected volunteer work undertaken by reviewers. The publisher is also responsible for ensuring that the publication system works smoothly, and that ethical guidelines are applied to assist the editor, author, and reviewer in performing their ethical duties.
The editor has the following responsibilities:
1.The editor should acknowledge receipt of submitted manuscripts within two working days of receipt and ensure an efficient, fair, and timely review process.
2.The editor should ensure that submitted manuscripts are processed in a confidential manner, and that no content of the manuscripts will be disclosed to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
3.The editor should recuse himself or herself from processing manuscripts if he or she has any conflict of interest with any of the authors or institutions related to the manuscripts.
4.The editor should not disclose the names and other details of the reviewers to a third party without the permission of the reviewers.
5.The editor has the right to make the final decision on whether to accept or reject a manuscript with reference to the significance, originality, and clarity of the manuscript and its relevance to the journal.
6.The editor should by no means make any effort to oblige the authors to cite his or her journal either as an implied or explicit condition of accepting their manuscripts for publication.
7.The editor should not use for his or her own research any part of any data or work reported in submitted and as yet unpublished articles.
8.The editor should respond promptly and take reasonable measures when an ethical complaint occurs concerning a submitted manuscript or a published paper, and the editor should immediately contact and consult with the author. In this case, a written formal retraction or correction may also be required.